I am u/Far_Fly5100, I was also banned for 3 days, it occured 36 hours ago , the reason is I was replying to this comment -

" What does this have to do with “Jews are too powerful”? Congress or the states could still ban routine infant circumcision if they wanted to. And for sure, a high number of “Christian” MPs would also vote against a ban, because Americans are gaslit on this topic and tend toward extreme views, especially when it comes to so-called traditions.
No other country treats circumcision as a normal routine, even though Jews and Muslims live there too. It is only the USA.
Muslims will go nuts as well, btw, and argue with “Islamophobia,” just like Jews do with antisemitism.
At the end of the day, every parent of any culture is capable of saying no. " link- https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivists/co...are_button

I was replying that Jews are one of the most powerful and influential people on Earth, with a population of 17 million but a lot of companies such as Dell, Facebook, Google ( co-founded ) and a lot of companies are run by Jews, the main reason why laws against MGM didn't pass in Denmark was because Jews were in the parliament disproportionately, surprising right ? its pretty evident that Jews are pretty powerful, and usually whenever there is a proposal for a law against MGM, like Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Cologne, Iceland, etc, the end result is the same, Jews interrupt first, not the Muslims, Muslims remain quiet at first, only when Jews fail, Muslims come up, and thats why if you try to ban it, Jews and their so called " religious freedom " will be harmed, in reality these so called Jews are actually in a mood of trying to impose their culture, especially of circumcision among a lot of people, like America, South Korea etc, which is just too barbaric kinda, they don't follow some global laws or smth like that tbh.

One guy even said "  They think their blood is special or some shit. " to the fact when I wrote "  the worldview has some issues as these Jews often times get allowed to do certain things freely, now, I don't say Jews are bad, but Jews don't criticize their own religion or habits, or criticize this practice of circumcision, they are too powerful economically now that they just pressure others to follow them instead of actually following the ethics of the world. " in a comment in the same post earlier. ( Link - https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivists/co...are_button . ) , mind you, this one was a much more targeted response than what I said.

Yet I was flagged by a Auto-Mod stating "Discrimination towards Identity Groups" , WTF?!, I never fucking said Jews are bad or smth, I just was criticizing the practice of circumcision until one guy asked why Jews are powerful and why are they able to stop it, and they just labelled me Anti-Semite atm.

Lemme be clear, Crystal Clear, if stating facts causes burns then the burns never came from the facts, they came from the hidden practice, Hidden Trauma, and Hidden scars, yk, those Pro-Circs keep screaming "Sensitivity is same in cut and uncut" , they borrow this statement from 1 study in 1966 by Masters and Johnson -

"A prime example is the persistent, yet deeply misleading, citation of early sex research pioneers Masters and Johnson.

As critics like Dr. Ronald Goldman and nurse Marilyn Milos meticulously detail in American Circumcision, proponents routinely invoke Masters and Johnson's highly influential work claiming no significant difference in sexual sensation or responsiveness between circumcised and intact men.
This claim, endlessly repeated, provided a veneer of scientific legitimacy, reassuring parents that nothing vital was lost.
However, a closer look reveals critical, methodological manipulation:

• Masters and Johnson only tested the sensitivity of the glans penis, comparing the relatively insensitive, exposed/keratinized glans (circumcised) with the protected glans (intact).
  
• They systematically excluded the foreskin itself – the very tissue containing the vast majority of specialized nerve endings crucial for fine touch and nuanced pleasure – from their sensitivity testing.
  
• Milos recounts the absurd justification: testing the foreskin wouldn't have been "fair" to circumcised men.
  
  

This wasn't science; it was obfuscation designed to create a misleading picture of sensory equivalence by ignoring the amputated tissue."

Credit : u/C4Charkey , Link -  https://www.reddit.com/user/C4Charkey/co...sto_v_the/
The entire table is attached below

Its like trying to compare the speed of two cars, 1st ones all wheels were removed, and 2nd ones wheel were there, but they were not being used, because using them would be 'discrimination to the car which doesn't have its wheels ' , its absolute non-sensical, the wheels of the 2nd car is the reason why when you are using it, it is gonna reach a fucking top speed, not like the car which had its wheels removed, FULL STOP.

If the car has wheels then its superior than the one it doesn't have, in the same sense, The Penis which has foreskin is the Car which has all its wheels intact. It does have an advantage, and no, its not unfair, its fair, you are intentionally removing the foreskin and then calling this comparison unfair. It is just insecurity to those who love circumcision. The fact is that, Foreskinned one is more sensitive is a fact, IT IS A FACT, and if it hurts you, then you should stop doing circumcision .

You are not birthed without a foreskin, you are birthed with one, and if you want sensitivity, then let that foreskin remain there. This is not discrimination, its a fact indicating this practice is harmful for the sensitivity of the penis, and if you want sensitivity of the penis, then stop circumcision.

Anyways, Lemme be clear, this ban to me and SubstantialHelp is not a sign of weakness, it strengthens the same principles we are acting on, Eric Clopper was fired by Harvard, imagine the narrow-mindedness of Harvard University, me and SubstantialHelp are a similar here, we don't stop, we come back even more intense. We will evade bans if permanently banned or banned for longtime, we will protests in the streets with masks on our face. We are netizens, and we are united to stop this bs practice of circumcision.

And we all are shadows, without our face hidden and using online anonymity, we can't be silenced, we will create a new identity.

Remember, I am not against Jews, I am against Circumcision, of anyone, whether be RIC or be it a 5 year old who was fearfully circumcised by the parents due to phimosis when the doctors didn't recommend steroidal cream at first ( with a staggering 90% success rate ) and never told the real complications and issues of circumcision. ( like we intactivists try to spread ). These pro-circs have corrupted the world by selling false propaganda of circumcision, that it has health benefits, so that doctors can love harvesting foreskins for money. We need to spread the word.

I am sorry tho if I really spoke smth too like Anti-Semitic, but honestly speaking, I wasn't extremist, I was correct bro tbh, and yes, ngl, It does feel weird. Tho I decided to read this story of a guy from America who is intact and is 40 years old now ( Link - https://www.reddit.com/r/FriendsOfTheFre...osing_the/ ) about his view on circumcision, a lot of things he borrowed from Eric Clopper's video, but also a lot of things he did research, such as that sensitivity one, and also, I watched Eric Clopper's video today on the Youtube, and turned up to be so real, amazing, everyone should watch it, and everyone should also read article before thinking of cutting people ( also the video of circumcising children to create a terror among them of this procedure ) , and hence, this is the way I spent the next 36 hours after my ban, educating myself more on circumcision and intactivism, and I will also read the " Sex as nature intended " by Kristen O'Hara soon.

Thank you for reading.

Foreskin Restoration Intactivist Network is a very large website devoted to non-surgical foreskin restoration. It appears to cover every aspect of restoration.

It appears to be a fairly new website that contains the skeleton of a very large website, but still needs to be fleshed out. The focus is on foreskin restoration, not circumcision.

I am the religion that shall not be named. The old one that practices male genital cutting. No troll, I am actually this religion. That is why I was cut, at home, on my kitchen table, by a non-medical religious official, with my entire extended family watching at 8 days old. 
 
I dared to name this fact on reddit. I named the religion, said I am it, and that the religion needs to be held accountable for their participation in cutting culture, and that religion is obviously no excuse for adults to elect to intrude into the genitals of children. 

My account was banned platform wide for 3 days seemingly automatically by automated AI. The reason given was a condescending "Reddit is a place for all people of diverse backgrounds. Hate or speech that insights violence against marginalized or vulnerable groups will be banned." The irony is palpable. WE in circumcision justice are the ultimate marginalized, vulnerable, and under protected group. We are spit on, gaslit, and marginalized, by the likes of no less reddit. The irony is not lost on me that reddit banning me IS The marginalization and incitement of violence against against the marginalized group, circ victims. They accuse me of the very same thing they are doing in the same breath. It's dystopian 1984 level sh*t.

Am I mad? Yes. But what I have more is almost respect. Existing social justice issues, like those that protect the religion that shall not be named, are so incredibly effective that they've fully convinced enormous platforms, like Reddit, to enforce their hypocritical and oppressive worldview across the entire platform. I am jealous of their success and their strategy. I want us to learn from them, and do the same in spaces that we have control over. 

Cutters and fence-post sitters who are only slightly on our side should be banned with the same copy-paste condescending hypocritical style message as I received. An enemy who does says that Intactivsts should fight for both anti-FGM and anti-Circumcision, that person should be banned and told with a copy paste message that THEY are promoting hate against an identity group, circumcised men. Trying to get justice for circumcision without addressing gender is like trying to get justice for slavery without addressing race. Enemies that try to ignore the gendered component .. should be banned with a copy paste message telling them they are inciting violence and hate against an under-protected group. Enemies that suggest any other issue is of relevance, like "religious freedom" should be condescendingly  banned 

If you can't beat em, join em. I intend to join em. Reddit's current policy isn't only oppressive, hypocritical, and infuriating, its also on to something about how successful modern justice movements work. Reddit's policy defends absolute justice for what it considers the victim class, with no regard for nuance, logic, or whether another underserved victim class is involved. We should do the same. Our issue is the ONLY one that matters, and we should treat other issues like dirt and treat them like they don't exist entirely . That's one way modern social justice issues empower their victim class, and to great success.

Wondering if anyone else here is navigating this uncomfortable in between state of still having a foreskin but also being circumcised? 

For me I find myself stuck on the question of: what was the point? I don't look cut except for the scar. The function and sensitivity of the preserved foreskin is high. I doubt any of the "benefits" would even apply to me, if I tought they were real or in any way areason to permanently alter the body of another person.

A person did research about Foreskin in a very detailed manner about the immunological responses and they found out that Foreskin has a lot of good bacteria and antibodies such as Corynebacterium which maintains a symbiotic relationship with immune system for fighting STDs and UTIs.

"The foreskin itself is a mucosal membrane that protects the glans, and covers the opening of the urinary tract which furthermore protect against pathogens."

"Another important factor in immune response is antibodies, the foreskin was found to contain both IGG and IGA antibodies which can help neutralize pathogens."

"The mucosal and epithelial integrity of the foreskin make for conditions that don’t allow for pathogenic anaerobic bacteria to multiply within the foreskin, meaning that contrary to popular belief, harmful anaerobic bacteria don’t multiply uncontrollably and cause infections."

"When circumcision occurs, it removes the epithelial integrity around the urethra, which makes the individual more prone to urinary tract infections."

"So based on this information and as seen in appendix A, both the inner and outer foreskin had the presence of all three indicating that the foreskin indeed produces antibodies as a specialized tissue. Within the foreskin, the inner foreskin had more antibody producing cells and cell nuclei in general."

"The presence of the IgG antibodies were seen in both. This would lead to the conclusion that the inner foreskin is the primary part of the foreskin that has the antibody producing cells, this is in line with how mucosal tissues are seen to have moreantibody producing cells compared to non mucosal tissues."

"Another aspect that speaks to the importance of the foreskin is the presence of Interleukin-15."

"The importance of Interleukin-15 from an immunology perspective is its signaling effect within the immune system. When it was administered to mice 3 weeks after infection from m. tuberculosis, it was found to promote their survival, suggesting that it has immunological effects against bacteria."

"The methods of how Interleukin-15 promoted their survival were its abilities to activate and expand killer NK cells, NKT cells, CD8+ effector memory and central memory T lymphocytes. Which can make Interleukin-15 very beneficial for immunity, good for vaccine strategies against infectious pathogens and good immunotherapeutic agent."

"For viral infections like HIV-1, Interleukin-15 was found to restore the ability of NK cells that were weakened by HIV-1. With that being said however, Interleukin-15 has also been implicated with several autoimmune conditions and chronic inflammatory diseases"

"In summary, Interleukin-15 is beneficial for immunity against both bacterial and viral infections. Interleukin-15 within the foreskin doesn’t over react causing an immune response to non pathogenic bacteria and the non pathogenic bacteria found in the foreskin modulate it so it’s not in excess."

"Over this time period it was found that circumcised males had a 53% higher risk of developing any given STI. Circumcised males had higher rates of gonorrhea, angiogenital warts and a 3 fold higher risk of syphilis when compared to intact males as seen in Appendix C"

"The study also goes on to establish how circumcision fails to provide any clinical benefit in the prevention of HIV. The studies done in Uganda which showed that circumcision prevented HIV was flawed as it failed to take into account the use of antiretrovirals like Truvada for HIV prevention

which is arguably the most important variable as it is the most effective way to prevent HIV. Additionally the study failed to examine the demographic and behavioural differences of the group which leaves room for confounding variables."

" (Frisch & Simonsen, 2022) Infant circumcision also places the infant at risk of MRSA. The new strands of MRSA have been found to carry toxin producing genes that cause hemolysis and tissue necrosis. MRSA is typically found in hospital based settings and is reaching epidemic levels within the United States. "

"This is relevant because following infant circumcision, the infant is left with an open wound where MRSA can enter and infect. In fact, a circumcised boy is at a twelve fold risk of an S. Aureus infection when compared with an intact one"

"During birth, the foreskin is fused to the head of the penis, during circumcision a blunt probe is used to tear it off then a device is used to crush the foreskin to maintain homeostasis when the physician later uses a scalpel and cuts it off.

During this procedure the infant's heart rate and blood pressure increased along with cortisol levels by 3 to 4 fold baseline levels, and it stayed elevated for days following the circumcision as well."

"Studies also report that parent-infant bonding, sleeping patterns, breast feeding and mood are all impacted in a negative way. Circumcised infants showed higher pain responses to vaccination even 6 months post circumcision.

A later follow up study showed that circumcised infants had more avoidance and anxiety when compared to intact males in adulthood, as seen in Appendix L  (Miani et al., 2020)"

"Lastly, a study conducted on 342,877 boys between 1994 and 2003, then followed for 9 years showed that infants who were circumcised had a 46% higher incidence of developing autism when compared with intact males with a confidence interval of 95%.

The possible links between autism and circumcision arise from early pain and stress to an increased incidence of neurodevelopmental, behavioral or psychological problems later in life. (Frisch & Simonsen, 2015)"

The whole study is here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication...infections
It is a compilation of all the different studies and it shows a clear line why Foreskin is very much important. And we can cite this study for it. Credit to u/Remarkable-Fox-6470 for this Research!

We get the maximum feeling/sexual input when the foreskin glides smoothly back and forth over the corona of the glans.
The foreskin has been proven to be FAR More sensitive and pleasurable than the glans.
The glans does contain pleasure receptors as well as pressure and temperature receptors, but pleasure mostly in the corona, where it interacts with the foreskin.
The glans and foreskin act as “push me pull me” on/off switches for sex.
When aroused, the foreskin sensors are dominant, and the glans sensations are suppressed.
After climax, the glans becomes dominant, ultra sensitive (and not in a good way), suppressing the foreskin and arousal.
https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Foreskin
The foreskin is the double-layered fold of smooth muscle tissue, blood vessels, neurons, skin, and mucous membrane part of the penis that covers and protects the glans penis and the urinary meatus.
The nature of the prepuce or foreskin, which is amputated and destroyed by circumcision, must be considered and fully understood in any discussion of male circumcision.
Purpura et al. (2018) describe the foreskin as follows:
"Few parts of the human anatomy can compare to the incredibly multifaceted nature of the human foreskin. At times dismissed as “just skin,” the adult foreskin is, in fact, a highly vascularized and densely innervated bilayer tissue, with a surface area of up to 90 cm, and potentially larger. On average, the foreskin accounts for 51% of the total length of the penile shaft skin and serves a multitude of functions. The tissue is highly dynamic and biomechanically functions like a roller bearing; during intercourse, the foreskin “unfolds” and glides as abrasive friction is reduced and lubricating fluids are retained. The sensitive foreskin is considered to be the primary erogenous zone of the male penis and is divided into four subsections: inner mucosa, ridged band, frenulum, and outer foreskin; each section contributes to a vast spectrum of sensory pleasure through the gliding action of the foreskin, which mechanically stretches and stimulates the densely packed corpuscular receptors. Specialized immunological properties should be noted by the presence of Langerhans cells and other lytic materials, which defend against common microbes, and there is robust evidence supporting HIV protection. The glans and inner mucosa are physically protected against external irritation and contaminants while maintaining a healthy, moist surface. The foreskin is also immensely vascularized and acts as a conduit for essential blood vessels within the penis, such as supplying the glans via the frenular artery

We get the maximum feeling/sexual input when the foreskin glides smoothly back and forth over the corona of the glans.
The foreskin has been proven to be FAR More sensitive and pleasurable than the glans.
The glans does contain pleasure receptors as well as pressure and temperature receptors, but pleasure mostly in the corona, where it interacts with the foreskin.
The glans and foreskin act as “push me pull me” on/off switches for sex.
When aroused, the foreskin sensors are dominant, and the glans sensations are suppressed.
After climax, the glans becomes dominant, ultra sensitive (and not in a good way), suppressing the foreskin and arousal.
https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Foreskin
The foreskin is the double-layered fold of smooth muscle tissue, blood vessels, neurons, skin, and mucous membrane part of the penis that covers and protects the glans penis and the urinary meatus.
The nature of the prepuce or foreskin, which is amputated and destroyed by circumcision, must be considered and fully understood in any discussion of male circumcision.
Purpura et al. (2018) describe the foreskin as follows:
"Few parts of the human anatomy can compare to the incredibly multifaceted nature of the human foreskin. At times dismissed as “just skin,” the adult foreskin is, in fact, a highly vascularized and densely innervated bilayer tissue, with a surface area of up to 90 cm, and potentially larger. On average, the foreskin accounts for 51% of the total length of the penile shaft skin and serves a multitude of functions. The tissue is highly dynamic and biomechanically functions like a roller bearing; during intercourse, the foreskin “unfolds” and glides as abrasive friction is reduced and lubricating fluids are retained. The sensitive foreskin is considered to be the primary erogenous zone of the male penis and is divided into four subsections: inner mucosa, ridged band, frenulum, and outer foreskin; each section contributes to a vast spectrum of sensory pleasure through the gliding action of the foreskin, which mechanically stretches and stimulates the densely packed corpuscular receptors. Specialized immunological properties should be noted by the presence of Langerhans cells and other lytic materials, which defend against common microbes, and there is robust evidence supporting HIV protection. The glans and inner mucosa are physically protected against external irritation and contaminants while maintaining a healthy, moist surface. The foreskin is also immensely vascularized and acts as a conduit for essential blood vessels within the penis, such as supplying the glans via the frenular artery.

Credit : u/BackgroundFaulty3

The Joy of Uncircumcising! is a 232-page book about every facet of non-surgical foreskin restoration. The author was the late Jim Bigelow, Ph.D., of California who was a psychologist and clergyman. The book was published at Aptos, California by Hourglass Book Publishing. The first edition was published in 1992 and the second edition was published in 1995. The ISBN is 0-934061-22-X.

The intended readers are circumcised men. The book has 22 chapters and covers about everything one could ask about circumcision and foreskin restoration.

The book is out-of-print, however the National Organization of Restoring Men (NORM) offers a PDF version for download.

Some men do not produce enough natural moisturizer. Jojoba oil has been recommended as a supplement for natural skin oil.[1] [2]


References

1. Pazyar N, Yaghoobi R, Ghassemi MR, Kazerouni A, Rafeie E, Jamshydian N. Jojoba in dermatology: a succinct review.  G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2013 Dec;148(6):687-91. PMID: 24442052.

2.  Tietel Z, Melamed S, Ogen-Shtern N, Eretz-Kdosha N, Silberstein E, Ayzenberg T, Dag A, Cohen G. Topical application of jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis L.) wax enhances the synthesis of pro-collagen III and hyaluronic acid and reduces inflammation in the ex-vivo human skin organ culture model. Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jan 26;15:1333085. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1333085. PMID: 38344180; PMCID: PMC10855461.

Science on this area is slow until recently. Just 3 months ago you may have seen articles that discovered it is the male G-spot. You essentially have your G-spot significantly (upto 95%) diminished or in rare cases completely gone (carved frenulum) if you are cut.

From newscientist:
Quote: 'The frenular delta is a highly sensitive, triangular area of tissue on the underside of the penis where the shaft meets the head. Centered around the frenulum (the "banjo string"), researchers have identified it as an epicenter of sexual sensation, earning it the nickname of the male "G-spot"'
So this entire time, the male g-spot was not the prostate, it was the part that is substantially cut during circumcision. This just shows how heavily manipulated the studies were. cucked cattle that fell for it easily
The idea of Male G-Spot was manipulated  so that circumcised men don't feel the harm and hurt.
Many people calling the old idea of having G-spot in the anus ( near prostate ) as a Gay Science smh. This is a strong point as FGM activists also protested for Clitorus ( being the most sensitive and the 2nd G-spot kinda) of females being left intact.
Personally, as an intact man, I have to say, touching the Frenular Delta ( keep in mind not just frenulum, but all the related skin directly and indirectly connected to it, like 50% part of the foreskin removed during circumcision ) do feel erogenous and pleasureful, and tbh, I have to say, it does feel the most sensitive part of the penis, much more than the head and the rest of the foreskin.
I've also seen a certain p@rnographic related content where the girl licked the frenular delta region , tbh which made me think that yes, its actually very sensitive part and many even know about it.
This is quite a strong point as it directly shows that removing the male G-spot by circumcision means we are curtailing a man's sexual freedom and men are only made 'capable enough to copulate' during sex, but not be able to feel the pleasure that their female counterparts feel. And not gonna lie, it also exposes how our system is one sided, i.e. leaning towards one gender's rights only, instead of both and still keeps viewing circumcision as something okay and fair, ( capitalistic intentions included too, circumcision industry values 6 billion dollars).
Sources :
1) https://www.iflscience.com/your-penis-ha...here-83013
2) https://www.newscientist.com/article/252...penis-yet/
3) https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/bo...s-frenulum
But once again, the already familiar world knows that Prostate is the G-spot, which is awkward, because women's G-spot lies in a place where penis does make contact, similarly a male one should lie on the penis actually, so that arousal and copulation is in its best form.
Pro-circs will deny it, but we have to show the world its a mutilation. "Anatomy textbooks may need to be rewritten: the penis’s main erogenous zone isn’t where we thought it was"
And we also need to look at Circumcised Victims more seriously than before as they truly are the real victims.
Thanks to Alfonso_Cepeda-Emiliani for doing this research, you can know more about him from here: https://en.intactiwiki.org/wiki/Alfonso_Cepeda-Emiliani
Other Important and Honourable Websites ( Must Read ) :
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40970806/
https://www.galdef.org/2025/08/15/new-da...neurotomy/
https://www.instagram.com/p/DWyoeZmFTOp/ ( responses of people in the comments are insane )
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1...Qs4z0AYXNI
https://www.researchgate.net/publication...hypothesis