Mohammad Siddiqui. A former paediatric surgeon has been jailed for five years and seven months for offences committed while operating an unsafe and unsanitary mobile child circumcision service.

---

Mohammad Siddiqui

---

This occurred in the United Kingdom.

Royal Dutch Medical association has already said it clearly that - ' Circumcision is a violation to child's right to autonomy and physical integrity. Circumcision can and does cause complications. ' and more than 90% of the countries agree to this statement. Only USA is the exception.

Go ahead and live in your ignorant cave as long as you can while the intact men will enjoy what real sex feels like, circumcision industry is a barbaric industry meant to earn money based on mutilating children and robbing them of their sexuality for the rest of their life, it should be stopped, and we Intactivists have the nature , science and ethics leaning towards us undoubtedly.

the HIV researchers put their biases over the studies, here are all the points of it -
i) Trials were terminated early when statistical significance was reached
ii) In One Study, circumcised men's infections rates were increasing faster than intact's cohort until the study was terminated early.
iii) Circumcised cohort could not copulate 4-6 weeks post-circumcision as the would healed: this was omitted from analysis and accentuates distortion from two prior flaws.
iv) Circumcised Experimental Group received more medical care, including proper condom use education.
v) Significantly more men were lost to the study than tested positive for the item being studied ( HIV )
vi) HIV was contracted via means other than sex.
vii) Circumcision offered no protection to women.
viii) Gross External Bias - Assuming cohort of sub-Saharan African men resemble North American babies
ix) Many researchers made no efforts to hide their religious and cultural beliefs.

x) The 60% is a statistical way to show it huge, in reality, its Relative Reduction Risk, Absolute Reduction Risk, the one which should be more accurately used to depict the data was just 1.5% risk of reduction and was gonna touch 0 if study wasn't eliminated early.
In a lot of Scientific studies, Foreskin has Anti-Microbial Properties ( Antibodies ) which help fight HIV and reduce the risk of other STDs, completely absent in circumcised men , detailed description - https://www.researchgate.net/publication...infections
Obviously Biased study ( Source : Eric Clopper - Sex and Circumcision, American Love Story Video )
All the lies of circumcision are cooked up so that the cutting cultures don't feel harmed by these. When circumcision actually has disadvantages fr.

Hello ato all

New to the circumcised forum hoping to meet like minded people, im a 19 yr old male living in the united kingdom but born in pakistan. I was circumcised from birth to fit muslim religious ideals. but not until I turned 15 did I question the procedure and have been upset about it since then.

Posting here for exposure and for my records. I keep losing the Facebook post. 

I've been to it a few times and hoping to make my third return next year! It's a great event. 

Genital Integrity Awareness Week
34th Annual Intactivist Conference
U.S. Capitol - Washington DC
March 29 - April 4, 2027
GIAW.org

Genital Autonomy Legal Defense and Education Fund (GALDEF) is a non-profit, membership-based, legal group that seeks to bring justice for circumcised men.

GALDEF would like lawsuits concerning circumcision injury to be successful, so GALDEF provides Resources for Attorneys to assist them in reaching a successful conclusion.

Humans are not supposed to be mutilated and assaulted Like this, specially by people whose job it is to help you get healthier the health system and doctors have done nothing but harm me in my entire life from the moment I was born that they did it did it again when I was a kid because I was born disabled did it again to me when I was adult and made getting healthcare and hrt borderline impossible this is not a human is supposed to experience. I don’t feel like a human. I don’t feel right calling myself one. All this shit and that’s been done to me starting from birth and having my dick cut off not only took that away from me, but it took away my humanity as well.

There is another location. REDDIT has a sub-reddit where grief regarding circumcision is expressed: 

r/CircumcisionGrief

Lemme be clear, Crystal Clear, if stating facts causes burns then the burns never came from the facts, they came from the hidden practice, Hidden Trauma, and Hidden scars, yk, those Pro-Circs keep screaming "Sensitivity is same in cut and uncut" , they borrow this statement from 1 study in 1966 by Masters and Johnson -

"A prime example is the persistent, yet deeply misleading, citation of early sex research pioneers Masters and Johnson.

As critics like Dr. Ronald Goldman and nurse Marilyn Milos meticulously detail in American Circumcision, proponents routinely invoke Masters and Johnson's highly influential work claiming no significant difference in sexual sensation or responsiveness between circumcised and intact men.
This claim, endlessly repeated, provided a veneer of scientific legitimacy, reassuring parents that nothing vital was lost.
However, a closer look reveals critical, methodological manipulation:

• Masters and Johnson only tested the sensitivity of the glans penis, comparing the relatively insensitive, exposed/keratinized glans (circumcised) with the protected glans (intact).
  
• They systematically excluded the foreskin itself – the very tissue containing the vast majority of specialized nerve endings crucial for fine touch and nuanced pleasure – from their sensitivity testing.
  
• Milos recounts the absurd justification: testing the foreskin wouldn't have been "fair" to circumcised men.
  

This wasn't science; it was obfuscation designed to create a misleading picture of sensory equivalence by ignoring the amputated tissue."

Credit : u/C4Charkey , Link -  https://www.reddit.com/user/C4Charkey/co...sto_v_the/
The entire table is attached below

Its like trying to compare the speed of two cars, 1st ones all wheels were removed, and 2nd ones wheels were there, but they were not being used, because using them would be 'discrimination to the car which doesn't have its wheels ' , its absolute non-sensical, the car's purpose is to move or gain speed for example, and the wheels of the 2nd car is the reason why when you are using it, it is gonna reach a fucking top speed, not like the car which had its wheels removed intentionally, it wasn't manufactured without wheels, their wheels were removed and then being compared with a car which had wheels, and then you made that specific comparison as discrimination, the real discrimination was removing the wheels in the first place.

If the car has wheels then its superior than the one it doesn't have, in the same sense, The Penis which has foreskin is similar to the Car which has all its wheels intact. It does have an advantage, and no, its not unfair, its fair, because you are intentionally removing the foreskin and then calling this comparison unfair. It is just insecurity to those who love circumcision. The fact is that, Foreskinned one is overall much more sensitive compared to the circumcised one is a fact, and including the foreskin is not a discrimination to circumcised men, its a true standard of comparison ( and the real meaning when you are comparing it actually ) especially when it was intentionally removed, meaning the sensitivity was intentionally reduced. IT IS A FACT, and if it hurts a cutter or the avg ppl ( who do not go through circumcision grief ) , then you should stop doing circumcision .

You are not birthed without a foreskin, you are birthed with one, and if you want sensitivity, then let that foreskin remain there. This is not discrimination, its a fact indicating this practice is harmful for the sensitivity of the penis, and if you want sensitivity of the penis, then stop circumcision. In a world where Foreskin is pretty much removed from all forms of textbooks and images, its obviously evident that these studies will be modified to catch up with them, or spread the same circumcision propaganda.
Btw I also recommend you all for reading the u/C4Charkey 's The Accidental Intactivist Manifesto, about a man in his 40s who was left intact at birth, and his views on circumcision. Link - https://www.reddit.com/r/FriendsOfTheFre...osing_the/ . Its a good documentary and is worth reading, you will gain some insights about the false propaganda more.
Thank You for reading.