I am u/Far_Fly5100, I was also banned for 3 days, it occured 36 hours ago , the reason is I was replying to this comment -

" What does this have to do with “Jews are too powerful”? Congress or the states could still ban routine infant circumcision if they wanted to. And for sure, a high number of “Christian” MPs would also vote against a ban, because Americans are gaslit on this topic and tend toward extreme views, especially when it comes to so-called traditions.
No other country treats circumcision as a normal routine, even though Jews and Muslims live there too. It is only the USA.
Muslims will go nuts as well, btw, and argue with “Islamophobia,” just like Jews do with antisemitism.
At the end of the day, every parent of any culture is capable of saying no. " link- https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivists/co...are_button

I was replying that Jews are one of the most powerful and influential people on Earth, with a population of 17 million but a lot of companies such as Dell, Facebook, Google ( co-founded ) and a lot of companies are run by Jews, the main reason why laws against MGM didn't pass in Denmark was because Jews were in the parliament disproportionately, surprising right ? its pretty evident that Jews are pretty powerful, and usually whenever there is a proposal for a law against MGM, like Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Cologne, Iceland, etc, the end result is the same, Jews interrupt first, not the Muslims, Muslims remain quiet at first, only when Jews fail, Muslims come up, and thats why if you try to ban it, Jews and their so called " religious freedom " will be harmed, in reality these so called Jews are actually in a mood of trying to impose their culture, especially of circumcision among a lot of people, like America, South Korea etc, which is just too barbaric kinda, they don't follow some global laws or smth like that tbh.

One guy even said "  They think their blood is special or some shit. " to the fact when I wrote "  the worldview has some issues as these Jews often times get allowed to do certain things freely, now, I don't say Jews are bad, but Jews don't criticize their own religion or habits, or criticize this practice of circumcision, they are too powerful economically now that they just pressure others to follow them instead of actually following the ethics of the world. " in a comment in the same post earlier. ( Link - https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivists/co...are_button . ) , mind you, this one was a much more targeted response than what I said.

Yet I was flagged by a Auto-Mod stating "Discrimination towards Identity Groups" , WTF?!, I never fucking said Jews are bad or smth, I just was criticizing the practice of circumcision until one guy asked why Jews are powerful and why are they able to stop it, and they just labelled me Anti-Semite atm.

Lemme be clear, Crystal Clear, if stating facts causes burns then the burns never came from the facts, they came from the hidden practice, Hidden Trauma, and Hidden scars, yk, those Pro-Circs keep screaming "Sensitivity is same in cut and uncut" , they borrow this statement from 1 study in 1966 by Masters and Johnson -

"A prime example is the persistent, yet deeply misleading, citation of early sex research pioneers Masters and Johnson.

As critics like Dr. Ronald Goldman and nurse Marilyn Milos meticulously detail in American Circumcision, proponents routinely invoke Masters and Johnson's highly influential work claiming no significant difference in sexual sensation or responsiveness between circumcised and intact men.
This claim, endlessly repeated, provided a veneer of scientific legitimacy, reassuring parents that nothing vital was lost.
However, a closer look reveals critical, methodological manipulation:

• Masters and Johnson only tested the sensitivity of the glans penis, comparing the relatively insensitive, exposed/keratinized glans (circumcised) with the protected glans (intact).
  
• They systematically excluded the foreskin itself – the very tissue containing the vast majority of specialized nerve endings crucial for fine touch and nuanced pleasure – from their sensitivity testing.
  
• Milos recounts the absurd justification: testing the foreskin wouldn't have been "fair" to circumcised men.
  
  

This wasn't science; it was obfuscation designed to create a misleading picture of sensory equivalence by ignoring the amputated tissue."

Credit : u/C4Charkey , Link -  https://www.reddit.com/user/C4Charkey/co...sto_v_the/
The entire table is attached below

Its like trying to compare the speed of two cars, 1st ones all wheels were removed, and 2nd ones wheel were there, but they were not being used, because using them would be 'discrimination to the car which doesn't have its wheels ' , its absolute non-sensical, the wheels of the 2nd car is the reason why when you are using it, it is gonna reach a fucking top speed, not like the car which had its wheels removed, FULL STOP.

If the car has wheels then its superior than the one it doesn't have, in the same sense, The Penis which has foreskin is the Car which has all its wheels intact. It does have an advantage, and no, its not unfair, its fair, you are intentionally removing the foreskin and then calling this comparison unfair. It is just insecurity to those who love circumcision. The fact is that, Foreskinned one is more sensitive is a fact, IT IS A FACT, and if it hurts you, then you should stop doing circumcision .

You are not birthed without a foreskin, you are birthed with one, and if you want sensitivity, then let that foreskin remain there. This is not discrimination, its a fact indicating this practice is harmful for the sensitivity of the penis, and if you want sensitivity of the penis, then stop circumcision.

Anyways, Lemme be clear, this ban to me and SubstantialHelp is not a sign of weakness, it strengthens the same principles we are acting on, Eric Clopper was fired by Harvard, imagine the narrow-mindedness of Harvard University, me and SubstantialHelp are a similar here, we don't stop, we come back even more intense. We will evade bans if permanently banned or banned for longtime, we will protests in the streets with masks on our face. We are netizens, and we are united to stop this bs practice of circumcision.

And we all are shadows, without our face hidden and using online anonymity, we can't be silenced, we will create a new identity.

Remember, I am not against Jews, I am against Circumcision, of anyone, whether be RIC or be it a 5 year old who was fearfully circumcised by the parents due to phimosis when the doctors didn't recommend steroidal cream at first ( with a staggering 90% success rate ) and never told the real complications and issues of circumcision. ( like we intactivists try to spread ). These pro-circs have corrupted the world by selling false propaganda of circumcision, that it has health benefits, so that doctors can love harvesting foreskins for money. We need to spread the word.

I am sorry tho if I really spoke smth too like Anti-Semitic, but honestly speaking, I wasn't extremist, I was correct bro tbh, and yes, ngl, It does feel weird. Tho I decided to read this story of a guy from America who is intact and is 40 years old now ( Link - https://www.reddit.com/r/FriendsOfTheFre...osing_the/ ) about his view on circumcision, a lot of things he borrowed from Eric Clopper's video, but also a lot of things he did research, such as that sensitivity one, and also, I watched Eric Clopper's video today on the Youtube, and turned up to be so real, amazing, everyone should watch it, and everyone should also read article before thinking of cutting people ( also the video of circumcising children to create a terror among them of this procedure ) , and hence, this is the way I spent the next 36 hours after my ban, educating myself more on circumcision and intactivism, and I will also read the " Sex as nature intended " by Kristen O'Hara soon.

Thank you for reading.