medical organizations
that have issued statements questioning or opposing circumcision

• Canadian Paediatric Society
  
• College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan
  
• College of Physicians and Surgeons of Manitoba
  
• College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia [pdf]
  
• Australian Pædiatric Association
  
• Australian College of Pediatrics
  
• Australasian Association of Paediatric Surgeons
  
• Australian College of Paediatrics
  
• Royal Australasian College of Physicians [pdf]
  
• Australian Medical Association
  
• Paediatric Society of New Zealand
  
• New Zealand Society of Paediatric Surgeons
  
• Belgium Advisory Committee on Bioethics
  
• British Medical Association
  
• General Medical Council (GMC) of the United Kingdom
  
• British Association of Paediatric Surgeons
  
• President of the British Association of Paediatric Urologists
  
• The Royal Dutch Medical Association (KNMG) [pdf]
  
• The Netherlands Society of General Practitioners
  
• The Netherlands Society of Youth Healthcare Physicians
  
• The Netherlands Association of Paediatric Surgeons
  
• The Netherlands Association of Plastic Surgeons
  
• The Netherlands Association for Paediatric Medicine
  
• The Netherlands Urology Association
  
• The Netherlands Surgeons’ Association
  
• German Association of Pediatricians
  
• German Association of Child and Youth Doctors
  
• Nordic Association of Clinical Sexology [pdf] - joint statement issued on behalf of Finnish Association for Sexology, Norwegian Society for Clinical Sexology, Danish Association for Clinical Sexology, Swedish Association for Sexology, Icelandic Sexology Association and Estonian Academic Society for Sexology
  
• Nordic Ombudsmen for Children and Pediatric Experts [pdf] (representing Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, and Greenland)
  
• Finnish Association of Pediatric Surgeons (Sulamaa Society)
  
• Finnish Medical Association
  
• Norwegian Council of Medical Ethics [pdf]
  
• Norwegian Children’s Ombudsman
  
• Norwegian Medical Association
  
• Norwegian Nurses Organization
  
• Norwegian Nursing Association
  
• University of Oslo
  
• Swedish Pediatric Society
  
• Swedish Children's Ombudsman
  
• Swedish Society of Medicine (SLS)
  
• Swedish Society of Health Professionals (Vårdförbundet)
  
• Swedish Paediatric Society (BLF)
  
• Swedish Association of Pediatric Surgeons (SLF)
  
• Danish Medical Association (Lægeforeningen)
  
• Danish Society of Family Physicians (Dansk Selskab for Almen Medicin)
  
• Danish Society for Anaesthesiology and Intensive-care Medicine (DASAIM) [pdf]
  
• South African Medical Association
  
• Icelandic Medical Association [pdf]
  

political organization

• Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly [statement later retracted under pressure from the circumcision lobby]
  

These statements are issued by medical trade associations. Medical trade associations exist to advance the business, legal, political, and professional interests of their fellows. Such circumcision statements tend to be biased in favor of advancing the interests of the fellows of the organization.

The Circumcision Reference Library was an early attempt to get medical information regarding circumcision onto the then new Internet. It stopped being updated about 2013, so the latest information is not available in the Circumcision Reference Library.

The text of many medical trade association statements published prior to 2013 are available and are arranged by nation and date of publication. Please see:

Circumcision: Medical Organization Official Policy Statements

The American Academy of Pediatrics and the British Medical Association have vacated their previous position statements on the circumcision of male children and now have NO official position on the practice.

Still, business wise, circumcision is a great industry, and thats why, logically, there should be more people supporting it, a lot of organisations are against it, so still, its a win for us Intactivists for now

Still, business wise, circumcision is a great industry, and thats why, logically, there should be more people supporting it, a lot of organisations are against it, so still, its a win for us Intactivists for now

I don't consider it a win because there's no traction from these supposed opposers

it is slow, but not 0, South Africa bans Non-Religious Circumcision on children, so any parent can't circumcise their child if they don't below to the religious groups, but still, we yet to go a long way, and we need to keep hope so that the Intactivism can continue, we will win.