SHARE:  Reddit
FishyFirefly   Yesterday, 09:30 PM
#1
The AAP says that the benefits outweigh the risks, but they also acknowledge that they never researched the risks and they also include cultural, religious, and ethnic reasons in their 2012 circumcision endorsement. They are biased.

AAP: "Evaluation of current evidence indicates that the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks, and the benefits of newborn male circumcision justify access to this procedure for those families who choose it."
But AAP in the same breath: "The true incidence of complications after newborn circumcision is unknown, in part due to differing definitions of “complication” and differing standards for determining the timing of when a complication has occurred (ie, early or late). Adding to the confusion is the comingling of “early” complications, such as bleeding or infection, with “late” complications such as adhesions and meatal stenosis."
"The true incidence of complications after newborn circumcision is unknown" pg e772
"It is difficult, if not impossible, to adequately assess the total impact of complications, because the data are scant and inconsistent regarding the severity of complications" pg e775
According to the AAP's Andrew Freedman: "I circumcised my son on my parents' kitchen table on the eight day of his life. But I did it for religious, not medical reasons. I did it because I had 3,000 years of ancestors looking over my shoulder" The New York Jewish Weekly, Sept 19, 2012
Also Andrew Freedman again: "In my practice, I like to sort of define it as a traditional custom, and if you belong to a tribe that does it then you really want it." American Circumcision, 2018
Also Douglas Diekema of the AAP trying to legalize a form of FGM: "The AAP policy statement on newborn male circumcision expresses respect for parental decision-making and acknowledges the legitimacy of including cultural, religious, and ethnic traditions when making the choice of whether to surgically alter a male infant's genitals... It might be more effective if federal and state laws enabled pediatricians to reach out to families by offering a ritual nick (to girls)" - Ritual Genital Cutting of Female Minors, April 26, 2010.
Also, according to the AAP it takes anywhere between 909 and 322.000 circumcisions and according to the CDC “The number needed to [circumcise] to prevent one HIV infection varied, from 1,231 in white males to 65 in black males, with an average in all males of 298. The model did not account for the cost of complications of circumcision. In addition, there is a risk that men may overestimate the protective effect of being circumcised and be less likely to adopt safe sex practices.”
  
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)