<![CDATA[Circumcised.com - Resources & Links]]> https://circumcised.com/ Wed, 29 Jul 2026 14:57:22 +0000 MyBB <![CDATA[Advice for teenagers, pubescents, adolescents and young adults]]> https://circumcised.com/Thread-Advice-for-teenagers-pubescents-adolescents-and-young-adults Wed, 22 Jul 2026 14:12:02 +0000 Old-guy]]> https://circumcised.com/Thread-Advice-for-teenagers-pubescents-adolescents-and-young-adults the foreskin is still developing and may not be immediately retractable. Circumcision is a nice word for the very harmful surgical amputation of the foreskin part of your penis and the permanent irreversible loss of its functions, which results in lifetime disability and handicap.

These young males are likely to be preyed upon by unscrupulous physicians who see an opportunity to earn a nice surgical fee for performing a circumcision. Young teens have reached an age where they can refuse harmful unwanted surgery and should do so when offered an irreversible adult style circumcision.

The British website, 4-skin Health, offers advice for teenagers and young adults.

Young males whose foreskin is still tight and difficult or impossible to retract may engage in manual stretching daily over a period of time, during which the daily stretching will cause the narrow part of the foreskin to stretch and become retractable. WikiHow gives full information on how to pull one's foreskin back without pain.

The daily or twice-daily stretching works by causing tissue expansion through mitosis. 

One should not force retraction and one should not cause oneself pain.]]> the foreskin is still developing and may not be immediately retractable. Circumcision is a nice word for the very harmful surgical amputation of the foreskin part of your penis and the permanent irreversible loss of its functions, which results in lifetime disability and handicap.

These young males are likely to be preyed upon by unscrupulous physicians who see an opportunity to earn a nice surgical fee for performing a circumcision. Young teens have reached an age where they can refuse harmful unwanted surgery and should do so when offered an irreversible adult style circumcision.

The British website, 4-skin Health, offers advice for teenagers and young adults.

Young males whose foreskin is still tight and difficult or impossible to retract may engage in manual stretching daily over a period of time, during which the daily stretching will cause the narrow part of the foreskin to stretch and become retractable. WikiHow gives full information on how to pull one's foreskin back without pain.

The daily or twice-daily stretching works by causing tissue expansion through mitosis. 

One should not force retraction and one should not cause oneself pain.]]> <![CDATA[Gliding action]]> https://circumcised.com/Thread-Gliding-action Fri, 19 Jun 2026 23:14:37 +0000 Old-guy]]> https://circumcised.com/Thread-Gliding-action Lakshaman & Parkash (1980) used the word “gliding” to describe the natural and normal movement of the outer foreskin of the penis as it moves seemingly without friction. They stated, “The outer layer of the prepuce in common with the skin of the shaft of the penis glides freely in "a to and fro fashion…”. The term stuck and is still used today.

Circumcision (amputation of the foreskin) tightens the residual skin so it largely prevents gliding action. Circumcised men generally lack gliding action and need lubrication to compensate for the lack of gliding action. Men circumcised at birth usually have no sense or understanding of the severity of their loss of pleasurable sensation.

Warren & Bigelow (1994) concluded the gliding action of the foreskin prevents vaginal dryness and is a benefit to the female partner.

Restoration of gliding action by foreskin restoration is a major advantage to circumcised men. The gliding action stimulates the nerves in the foreskin so it contributes to sexual pleasure. It aids penetration of the female partner and contributes to female pleasure by reduction of friction in the vagina. It also facilitates masturbation. 

There is substantial additional information available on the Internet at several locations. Just search for “gliding action”.]]> Lakshaman & Parkash (1980) used the word “gliding” to describe the natural and normal movement of the outer foreskin of the penis as it moves seemingly without friction. They stated, “The outer layer of the prepuce in common with the skin of the shaft of the penis glides freely in "a to and fro fashion…”. The term stuck and is still used today.

Circumcision (amputation of the foreskin) tightens the residual skin so it largely prevents gliding action. Circumcised men generally lack gliding action and need lubrication to compensate for the lack of gliding action. Men circumcised at birth usually have no sense or understanding of the severity of their loss of pleasurable sensation.

Warren & Bigelow (1994) concluded the gliding action of the foreskin prevents vaginal dryness and is a benefit to the female partner.

Restoration of gliding action by foreskin restoration is a major advantage to circumcised men. The gliding action stimulates the nerves in the foreskin so it contributes to sexual pleasure. It aids penetration of the female partner and contributes to female pleasure by reduction of friction in the vagina. It also facilitates masturbation. 

There is substantial additional information available on the Internet at several locations. Just search for “gliding action”.]]> <![CDATA[Links to literature about MGM (that can be used against it) or the foreskin.]]> https://circumcised.com/Thread-Links-to-literature-about-MGM-that-can-be-used-against-it-or-the-foreskin Mon, 01 Jun 2026 17:54:59 +0000 A_P]]> https://circumcised.com/Thread-Links-to-literature-about-MGM-that-can-be-used-against-it-or-the-foreskin Links to literature about the foreskin or that refutes MGM

Links to literature about showing higher UTI risk with MGM
Links to literature that refutes the MGM hypocrisy

If anyone else has more medical literature, please share it to this thread!]]> Links to literature about the foreskin or that refutes MGM

Links to literature about showing higher UTI risk with MGM
Links to literature that refutes the MGM hypocrisy

If anyone else has more medical literature, please share it to this thread!]]>