Science on this area is slow until recently. Just 3 months ago you may have seen articles that discovered it is the male G-spot. You essentially have your G-spot significantly (upto 95%) diminished or in rare cases completely gone (carved frenulum) if you are cut.
From newscientist:
Quote: 'The frenular delta is a highly sensitive, triangular area of tissue on the underside of the penis where the shaft meets the head. Centered around the frenulum (the "banjo string"), researchers have identified it as an epicenter of sexual sensation, earning it the nickname of the male "G-spot"'
So this entire time, the male g-spot was not the prostate, it was the part that is substantially cut during circumcision. This just shows how heavily manipulated the studies were. cucked cattle that fell for it easily
The idea of Male G-Spot was manipulated so that circumcised men don't feel the harm and hurt.
Many people calling the old idea of having G-spot in the anus ( near prostate ) as a Gay Science smh. This is a strong point as FGM activists also protested for Clitorus ( being the most sensitive and the 2nd G-spot kinda) of females being left intact.
Personally, as an intact man, I have to say, touching the Frenular Delta ( keep in mind not just frenulum, but all the related skin directly and indirectly connected to it, like 50% part of the foreskin removed during circumcision ) do feel erogenous and pleasureful, and tbh, I have to say, it does feel the most sensitive part of the penis, much more than the head and the rest of the foreskin.
I've also seen a certain p@rnographic related content where the girl licked the frenular delta region , tbh which made me think that yes, its actually very sensitive part and many even know about it.
This is quite a strong point as it directly shows that removing the male G-spot by circumcision means we are curtailing a man's sexual freedom and men are only made 'capable enough to copulate' during sex, but not be able to feel the pleasure that their female counterparts feel. And not gonna lie, it also exposes how our system is one sided, i.e. leaning towards one gender's rights only, instead of both and still keeps viewing circumcision as something okay and fair, ( capitalistic intentions included too, circumcision industry values 6 billion dollars).
Sources :
1) https://www.iflscience.com/your-penis-ha...here-83013
2) https://www.newscientist.com/article/252...penis-yet/
3) https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/bo...s-frenulum
But once again, the already familiar world knows that Prostate is the G-spot, which is awkward, because women's G-spot lies in a place where penis does make contact, similarly a male one should lie on the penis actually, so that arousal and copulation is in its best form.
Pro-circs will deny it, but we have to show the world its a mutilation. "Anatomy textbooks may need to be rewritten: the penis’s main erogenous zone isn’t where we thought it was"
And we also need to look at Circumcised Victims more seriously than before as they truly are the real victims.
Thanks to Alfonso_Cepeda-Emiliani for doing this research, you can know more about him from here: https://en.intactiwiki.org/wiki/Alfonso_Cepeda-Emiliani
Other Important and Honourable Websites ( Must Read ) :
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40970806/
https://www.galdef.org/2025/08/15/new-da...neurotomy/
https://www.instagram.com/p/DWyoeZmFTOp/ ( responses of people in the comments are insane )
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1...Qs4z0AYXNI
https://www.researchgate.net/publication...hypothesis
From newscientist:
Quote: 'The frenular delta is a highly sensitive, triangular area of tissue on the underside of the penis where the shaft meets the head. Centered around the frenulum (the "banjo string"), researchers have identified it as an epicenter of sexual sensation, earning it the nickname of the male "G-spot"'
So this entire time, the male g-spot was not the prostate, it was the part that is substantially cut during circumcision. This just shows how heavily manipulated the studies were. cucked cattle that fell for it easily
The idea of Male G-Spot was manipulated so that circumcised men don't feel the harm and hurt.
Many people calling the old idea of having G-spot in the anus ( near prostate ) as a Gay Science smh. This is a strong point as FGM activists also protested for Clitorus ( being the most sensitive and the 2nd G-spot kinda) of females being left intact.
Personally, as an intact man, I have to say, touching the Frenular Delta ( keep in mind not just frenulum, but all the related skin directly and indirectly connected to it, like 50% part of the foreskin removed during circumcision ) do feel erogenous and pleasureful, and tbh, I have to say, it does feel the most sensitive part of the penis, much more than the head and the rest of the foreskin.
I've also seen a certain p@rnographic related content where the girl licked the frenular delta region , tbh which made me think that yes, its actually very sensitive part and many even know about it.
This is quite a strong point as it directly shows that removing the male G-spot by circumcision means we are curtailing a man's sexual freedom and men are only made 'capable enough to copulate' during sex, but not be able to feel the pleasure that their female counterparts feel. And not gonna lie, it also exposes how our system is one sided, i.e. leaning towards one gender's rights only, instead of both and still keeps viewing circumcision as something okay and fair, ( capitalistic intentions included too, circumcision industry values 6 billion dollars).
Sources :
1) https://www.iflscience.com/your-penis-ha...here-83013
2) https://www.newscientist.com/article/252...penis-yet/
3) https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/bo...s-frenulum
But once again, the already familiar world knows that Prostate is the G-spot, which is awkward, because women's G-spot lies in a place where penis does make contact, similarly a male one should lie on the penis actually, so that arousal and copulation is in its best form.
Pro-circs will deny it, but we have to show the world its a mutilation. "Anatomy textbooks may need to be rewritten: the penis’s main erogenous zone isn’t where we thought it was"
And we also need to look at Circumcised Victims more seriously than before as they truly are the real victims.
Thanks to Alfonso_Cepeda-Emiliani for doing this research, you can know more about him from here: https://en.intactiwiki.org/wiki/Alfonso_Cepeda-Emiliani
Other Important and Honourable Websites ( Must Read ) :
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40970806/
https://www.galdef.org/2025/08/15/new-da...neurotomy/
https://www.instagram.com/p/DWyoeZmFTOp/ ( responses of people in the comments are insane )
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1...Qs4z0AYXNI
https://www.researchgate.net/publication...hypothesis